|
Affiliation |
Faculty of Medicine School of Medicine Department of Social Medicine, Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy Studies |
|
Title |
Lecturer |
|
Related SDGs |
|
SHIMIZU Ukyo
|
|
|
Degree 【 display / non-display 】
-
Ph. D (Informatics) ( 2022.3 Nagoya University )
Research Areas 【 display / non-display 】
-
Humanities & Social Sciences / Philosophy and ethics
-
Humanities & Social Sciences / Sociology of science, history of science and technology
Papers 【 display / non-display 】
-
An Inconspicuous Forerunner of Philosophy of Risk Assessment: Cranor’s Analysis for the Proposition 65 Reviewed
SHIMIZU Ukyo
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis 34 ( 1 ) 3 - 12 2024.6
Authorship：Lead author, Corresponding author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal) Publisher：The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan
-
Remaking the Concept of “Trans-science” Reviewed
Ukyo Shimizu
Kagaku tetsugaku 54 ( 1 ) 85 - 104 2021.9
Authorship：Lead author, Corresponding author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal) Publisher：The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
Other Link： http://id.ndl.go.jp/bib/031763950
-
<サーヴェイ論文>認識論と倫理学の交差点としての「帰納のリスク」 Reviewed
清水 右郷
Contemporary and Applied Philosophy ( 12 ) 25 - 66 2021.2
Authorship：Lead author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal) Publisher：応用哲学会
So called "inductive risk" is an old but newly explored concept in philosophy of science. The central claim of the argument from inductive risk (AIR) is that scientists must make value judgments in their scientific reasoning, so that epistemology, ethics, and science and technology studies intersect in this theme. In this paper I give an overview of the controversy over inductive risk. Although the AIR has been criticized by proponents of value-free ideal of science, recent defenders of the AIR elaborate how and why scientific reasoning must involve value judgments. Furthermore, they have found that extended interpretations of inductive risk serve to grasp many value-laden choices involved in scientific reasoning, exploring many case studies in various disciplines. The defenders of the AIR are not monolithic, however. There remain some disagreements about the precise nature of the concept of inductive risk. This fact may induce some skeptical attitude toward the significance of the concept of inductive risk and the AIR. The last part of this paper is devoted to evaluating what advantages the concept of inductive risk and the AIR have relative to existing literature on science and values.
DOI： 10.14989/261704
-
<研究論文(原著論文)>歴史的偏りの矯正としての予防原則 Reviewed
清水 右郷
Contemporary and Applied Philosophy ( 12 ) 67 - 104 2021.2
Authorship：Lead author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal) Publisher：応用哲学会
Although there have been long-lasting controversies over the precautionary principle (PP), its rationality is still unclear. The recent work by Daniel Steel offered a promising defense of the PP. His central idea is correction of historical bias related to environmental policies. According to his arguments, the PP is remarkably effective for the correction of historical bias in contrast to cost-benefit analysis and risk trade-off analysis. Furthermore, he argued that the PP is relevant not only to risk management but also to risk assessment, so that the PP can be an important topic of philosophy of science. This paper aims to evaluate and develop the arguments for the PP which Steel defended. After reviewing the existing literature on the PP, I will summarize how his idea gets out of the predica- ment. Then I will identify and examine possible criticisms against Steel's arguments. In particular, I will discuss two important themes which Steel barely mentioned: domain-dependency of the PP and correction of historical bias in the context of risk assessment. My discussion about these themes will contribute to exploring potential advantages of Steel's defense of the PP.
DOI： 10.14989/261705
-
How to Reconcile The Conflicts between Epistemic and Ethical Norms: An Examination of The Controversy over Randomized Controlled Trial and Clinical Equipoise Reviewed
Ukyo Shimizu
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis 29 ( 2 ) 111 - 121 2019
Authorship：Lead author, Corresponding author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)
Books 【 display / non-display 】
-
相談事例から考える研究倫理コンサルテーション = A workbook of research ethics consultation
松井, 健志, 山本, 圭一郎, 伊吹, 友秀, 井上, 悠輔（ Role： Contributor , Case 16 企業との画像解析ソフトウェア共同研究）
医歯薬出版 2022.10 （ ISBN:9784263732106 ）
Total pages：xii, 407p Language：Japanese Book type：Scholarly book
-
奥田 太郎 (監訳), 和田 慈・清水 右郷（訳）（ Role： Joint translator , 第1章〜第3章）
名古屋大学出版会 2020 （ ISBN:9784815809867 ）
Language：Japanese Book type：Scholarly book
MISC 【 display / non-display 】
-
-
Kagaku tetsugaku 57 ( 1 ) 77 - 80 2024.11
Authorship：Lead author, Corresponding author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Book review, literature introduction, etc. Publisher：The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
-
Discussing Better Regulation on PFAS from the Perspective of Risk Research
HIRAI Yusuke, MURAKAMI Michio, INOUE Tomoya, TANAKA Shuhei, NAGAI Takashi, ASAMI Mari, UNEYAMA Chikako, SHIMIZU Ukyo
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis 34 ( 1 ) 17 - 20 2024.6
Language：Japanese Publishing type：Meeting report Publisher：The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan
-
Discussing the Present from Fukushima: A Panoramic View of the Lessons and Perspectives for Risk Governance
MURAKAMI Michio, KAI Michiaki, TSUBOKURA Masaharu, YASUTAKA Tetsuo, KANDA Reiko, SHIMIZU Ukyo, ANDO Ryoko, YONEDA Minoru
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis 33 ( 2 ) 91 - 95 2023.10
Language：Japanese Publishing type：Meeting report Publisher：The Society for Risk Analysis, Japan
-
無知学と科学政策と科学哲学の接続—特集 無知学/アグノトロジーとは何か : 科学・権力・社会
清水 右郷
現代思想 51 ( 7 ) 162 - 174 2023.6
Authorship：Lead author, Corresponding author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Article, review, commentary, editorial, etc. (trade magazine, newspaper, online media) Publisher：青土社
-
社会派科学哲学の道をゆっくり歩く—特集 知のフロンティア : 今を読み解く23の知性 Reviewed
清水 右郷
現代思想 51 ( 1 ) 26 - 33 2023.1
Authorship：Lead author, Corresponding author Language：Japanese Publishing type：Article, review, commentary, editorial, etc. (trade magazine, newspaper, online media)
Presentations 【 display / non-display 】
-
Bridging Philosophy of Science and Clinical Research Ethics: Towards a Valuable Integration
Ukyo SHIMIZU
Philosophy of Medicine Workshop 2025.4.12
Event date： 2025.4.12
Language：English Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)
-
症例報告の同意取得のあり方
清水右郷
第10回研究倫理を語る会 2025.3.8
Event date： 2025.3.8
Language：Japanese Presentation type：Poster presentation
-
メタサイエンスの未来地図
清水右郷
メタサイエンス研究会ワークショップ 2025.3.1
Event date： 2025.3.1
Language：Japanese Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)
File： メタサイエンスの未来地図0313公開版.pdf
-
Connecting Methodological Progress to Desirable Outcomes through Policymaking
Ukyo SHIMIZU
The 25th Annual Conference of Japan Evaluation Society 2024.12.22
Event date： 2024.12.21 - 2024.12.22
Language：Japanese Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)
-
がん研究の社会認識論の可能性を広げる
清水右郷
日本科学哲学会第57回年次大会 2024.12.1
Event date： 2024.11.30 - 2024.12.1
Language：Japanese Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)
Awards 【 display / non-display 】
-
The Distinguished Risk Researcher Award
2022.11 The Society for Risk Analysis Japan
Award type：International academic award (Japan or overseas)
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 【 display / non-display 】
-
科学における《価値中立性》理念に対する科学哲学的観点からの再検討
Grant number：24K00002 2024.04 - 2029.03
日本学術振興会 科学研究費基金 基盤研究(B)
井頭 昌彦
Authorship：Coinvestigator(s)
-
がん疫学の社会認識論
Grant number：22KJ1789 2023.04 - 2025.03
独立行政法人日本学術振興会 科学研究費基金 特別研究員奨励費
Authorship：Principal investigator
-
Social epistemology for cancer epidemiology
Grant number：22J01679 2022.04 - 2025.03
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows
Authorship：Principal investigator Grant type：Competitive